From the moment President Bush nominated John Roberts for a position on the Supreme Court, for some reason, I have been unable to get worked up over it. I mean, he's probably a right wing nut job, but everything I've read about him serves to nullify some of my concerns. For the most part, he seems like a reasonable individual. He might be conservative, but it seems to me like he might actually decided each case on their merits, rather than on his ideology (ala Scalia or Thomas). I stumbled across this article which only serves to reinforce my original belief. Apparently Roberts did some minor Pro Bono work on the Romers vs. Evans case. A decision which struck down a Colorado constitutional amendment which sought to descriminate against gay people. Read the article, it's kinda interesting...
New York Times
About Me
- Chris
- I'm a twenty-something gay male, born on the west coast but transplanted to the east. I have an affinity for cheap vodka and happy hours, house music and dancing, and hanging out with the mean girls. I've got a witty and sarcastic sense of humor, and as Tos so wonderfully put it, "The only boy I know who was Premier Exec in college and makes a trip to Germany like anyone else makes a trip to the store..."
No comments:
Post a Comment